
| Home |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Methods |
Results |
Discussion |
Sources |
![]() |
![]() |
|
A regression analysis of the census tract populations and
the number of burglaries produced a best fit equation of [number of burglaries] = 2.6379 +
0.0029[total population],
or (y= 0.0029x +2.6379). This
suggests a general trend where census tracts with larger populations
have a higher prevalence of residential burglaries. The
correlation coefficient R2 was 0.155163 which is a relatively low value, reflecting
the large number of residuals that do not closely follow the trend,
especially the four census tracts for which there are unexpectedly many
burglaries relative to their population.
|
![]() |
![]() |
| The number of residential
burglaries was also compared to the median household income per census
tracts. The regression produced a best fit line of [number of burglaries] = 22.6125 -
0.0001[median household income],
or y = -0.0001x +
22.6125.
This shows a decreasing
number of residential burglaries as the median household income per
census tracts increases, such that higher income neighbourhoods appear
to experience fewer burglaries. The R2 was 0.08236,
which is an even lower value than that found for the comparison of
population and burglaries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
| We performed a regression
analysis
of the number of residential burglaries in a census tract relative to
the number of owner-occupied residences. The equation of the best
fit line was: [number of burglaries] =
-0.0011[number of owner
occupants] + 18.3475,
or y = -0.0011x + 18.3475.
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Another regression analysis was
performed on the number of residential burglaries relative to
the number of renter occupied residences. The equation for the
best fit line was: [number
of burglaries] = 0.005[number of renter occupants] + 5.5043, or
y = 0.005x + 5.5043.
The slope of the
equation was small but
positive, suggesting that the number of burglaries increases with the
number of renters in a census tract. The R2 value was
0.373826, a substantially larger value than the R2 found in the
previous owner occupants analysis. |
![]() |
![]() |
| This regression analysis
was performed for the number of residential burglaries in relation to
the number of single unit homes. The equation for the best fit
line was: [number of burglaries] = 0.0021[single
unit homes] + 13.7976, or y =
0.0021x + 13.7976.
The slope of the equation was quite small, but positive,
which suggests that the number of burglaries would increase when the
number of single unit homes increases. However, the R2
value
was 0.00826, indicating a weak correlation between the two variables.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
The correlation of multiple-unit homes and residential
burglaries produced an equation of [number of burglaries] = 7.5863 +
0.0115[number of multiple-unit homes],
or y= 0.0115x + 7.5863. The
R2 value
was 0.42887, the largest value out of all of our analyses, suggesting
that the prevalence of multiple-unit home such as apartments is
the factor most closely associated with the number of residential
burglaries.
|