Abstract
I evaluated the utility of landscape variables as predictors of elevations associated with the forest - alpine ecotone in the southeast corner of British Columbia. Multiple regression showed that average summer temperature, latitude / longitude and snow depth ,all factored by aspect, were related to the elevation of woodland and parkland ecosystems. While these variables correlated with elevation (p= <0.05), the correlations were stronger on north and southwest aspects. This may have important implications for interpretation of high elevation ecosytem mapping in BC.
Introduction
The main objective of this study is to conduct a preliminary investigation into the relationship between available landscape-wide environmental variables and elevations associated with the forest-alpine ecotone. Specifically, elevation points collected at the Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir (ESSF) Woodland to Parkland transition zone are related to available landscape-wide environmental variables.
The study area (formerly know as the Rocky Mtn.
Forest district) includes the East Kootenay
Mountains
and the Rocky Mountain trench area from Golden south to the U.S. border
(see Figure 1). The
ESSF Parkland/Woodland boundary (PWB) begins where continous forest
starts to
thin out and form open clumps, islands or ribbons of heath and herb
meadows. PWB
elevations points were identified as areas where trees transition from
more
than 50% cover to less than 50% cover on large and continuous cool,
neutral and warm aspects.
Terms:
- ESSF woodland is described as open and contiuous, upper-elevation forest.
- In the ESSF parkland, islands of trees occur together with krummholz, heath, herb meadows, and grasslands.
See Figure 2 for a map of the
high elevation BEC zones in the study area.
BEC Alpine and Subalpine Ecosystems of BC
Click below for a link to the BEC Alpine project websiteClimate and Mountains;
"Climate is the fundamental factor in establishing a natural environment, it sets the stage upon which all physical, chemical, and biological processes operate. This becomes especially evident at the climatic margins of the earth, i.e., desert and tundra. Under temperate conditions, the effects of climate are often muted and intermingled so that the relationships between stimuli and reaction are difficult to isolate, but under extreme conditions the relationship becomes more evident. Extremes constitute the norm in many areas within high mountains; for this reason, a basic knowledge of climatic processes and characteristics is a prerequisite to an understanding of the mountain mileu."
- Andy Bach
Department of Geography
Minnesota State University
Methods
316 PWB elevation points were identified from air photos (or
ortho rectified imagery if air photos were not available for certain
areas), of which 302 were used in this analysis due to data entry
errors. Elevation points were selected in areas that
denoted large patches of identifiable ESSF woodland to parkland
transition zones. See Figure 3 (a thru c) for an example showing PWB
points on an
ortho photo.
Linear models for these PWB points based on landscape variables (see Table 1), were ranked using Akaike's information criterion (AIC) method (Burnham and Anderson 2003). For model selection, AIC uses the principle of parsimony and enforces the trade-off between underfitting and overfitting (Burnham and Anderson 2003). It is important to recognize that there is substantial uncertainty as to which model is the best for this dataset. However, a group of a priori candidate models were defined and the model with the lowest AIC value was selected as the best model. AIC value is calculated with the following formula:
AIC = -2(maximized log-likelihood) + 2K
where K is the number of parameters and the maximized log-likelihood is the natural logarithm of the likelihood function for a particular model.
The snow depth data was transformed by taking the
log of
(snowdepth +2) and wind speed was transformed by adding two to all
values. These variables were transformed
in order to
homogenize the scales of the data and even out the variances. All analysis was preformed with the program - R
2.3.1 (2006).
Data and Landscape Variable Summary
- Latitude and Longitude (decimal degrees);
- Digital Elevation Models (rasterized to 25m cell size) from which slope, aspect, transformed aspect (TA), slope adjusted transformed aspect (TASL), and elevation were calculated;
- Raster
climate
data including average temperature (400m
cell size), average precipitation (400m cell size), snow depth (950m
cell size)
and windspeed (4km cell size);
- Geology
Polygons
(basic rock type combinations for
region); and,
- Air photos (1:15 000 and 1:20 000) and 2005 orthorecified imagery (0.5m cell size)
Results
Analysis of stepwise forward and backward AIC model selection suggests that stepwise chosen linear model 3 (AIC = 2389) best predicts elevation of the PWB (see Table. 1).
Factor analysis of the AIC selected
model 3 suggests that north and southwest aspects may show the most
consistent
elevational trends (see Table 2).
Discussion / Conclusion
Upper Elevation BEC Zone
Mapping Issues
in
Higher elevation
BEC subzones
are typically mapped in bands interpreted from elevation and aspect
rules (Eng
and Meidinger 1999). Plant communities, however, are not directly
affected by
elevation, but rather by variables such as temperature and
precipitation that
covary with elevation and latitude (Lookingbill
and Urban 2005). These variables are difficult to measure at
large
spatial scales because the forest to alpine ecotone is
very heterogeneous due to variation in slope, aspect, topography,
geology,
solar radiation and past and present glacial events.
Establishing
broad “elevation/aspect
rules” for the PWB boundary in mountainous areas of the former Rocky
Mountain
District is a subjective task. Identifying where dense patches of trees
in the
upper ESSF start to thin out to less than 50% cover on air photos is
also
subjective due to the fuzzy (i.e. vaguely defined) nature of the
PWB.
Nevertheless, there are many
areas that show
reasonably clear transitional boundaries (See Figure 4).
1) Those
that
make the PWB bands wider or narrower than normal in comparison to
the expected
elevation band for that climatic area; and,
2) Local or regional
anomalies,
where areas with a high cover of trees or parkland meadow do not relate
to
consistent
elevation/aspect rules.
Timoney (1995)
suggests that
edaphic conditions exert a stronger control over tree distribution on
nutrient-poor, dry sandy soils in the forest-tundra ecotone than on
nutrient-rich, moist soils. Thus, on
unfavorable arctic terrain the forest-tundra ecotone is wider,
more
patchy and located southward of forest-tundra on favorable terrain
(Timoney
1995). Moist, nutrient-rich terrains, in
contrast, may allow a high continous cover of trees to extend northward
until
absolute climatic thresholds are reached.
In this project it has been assumed that areas
with “normal” conditions will occur within a certain mountainous area
(rule
polygons) and that they will be prominent enough to establish general
rules for macroclimatic
thresholds. This may, however, not always be the case due to the
influence of
prevalent and complex edaphic factors.
Specific Issues:
Difficulties and
uninterpretable
components in this project include:
- Areas where bedrock topography (and/or instability) control tree patch size and shape are difficult to assign percent cover to and may not be reflective of “normal” macroclimatic conditions ;
- Areas with unknown edaphic controls (e.g. pH, nutrient levels) can also confound the establishment of “elevation/aspect rules”;
- Areas with scattered patches of krummholz (high wind areas?) are not easy to locate on aerial photographs;
- Areas with frequent or extensive recent fire history are difficult to classify via aerial photographs;
- Areas in the shadows of mountains are uninterpretable;
- Areas with blacked-out ortho coverage are difficult to map;
- Areas where the terrain is extremely steep making the resulting parkland and/or woodland band very narrow, and nearly undistinguishable, challenge the woodland/parkland/alpine concept. The upper boundary of what looks like woodland can reach very high elevations in this case (e.g., >2340m); and,
- Areas with environmental influences such as xeric
moisture regime, coarse texture or high insolation (i.e. rocky south
slopes) have
low to sparse tree cover and therefore woodland/parkland transitions
can be
very broad or not readily discernable.
Conclusion
A preliminary investigation into the relationship between available landscape environmental variables and elevations associated with the PWB reveals that elevation may be most closely related to average summer temperature + latitude + log(May snowdepth +2) + longitude, all factored by general aspect. It must be noted that landscape variables used in this study are of varying resolutions (25m for aspect to 4km for windspeed) and only provide a cursory look at the myriad environmental variables that may influence the forest to alpine ecotone.
The findings of this
study suggest that north and southwest aspects may show more consistent
elevational trends.
Further investigation in to the relationship
between landscape
variables and the PWB could involve plant species information and
more plant relevant landscape variables such as leaf area index,
relative solar radiation and soil type, pH, moisture, etc. As
well, this study would have benifitted from a larger sample size and
the use of field data collected at a more local scale for accuracy
comparisons.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to the BC Ministry of Forests and
Range, the US National Oceanic & Atmospheric Association (NOAA),
Wang et al. (2006) and
Environment
Canada's Wind Energy Atlas program for supplying data for this project.
Burnam,
K.P. and D.R. Anderson 2003. Model
Selection and Multimodel Inferance: A practical Information-theoretic
Approach. Springer; 2nd Edition. 488 pgs.
Eng,
M. and D., Miedinger
(1999) A Method for Large-scale Biogeoclimatic Mapping in British
Columbia (Version 1). Report for
Research Branch, BC Ministry of Forests and Range.
Lookingbill, T. and D.
Urban (2005) Gradient analysis, the next generation: towards more
plant-relevant explanatory variables. Can. J. For. Res. 35:
1744-1753.
Timoney,
K. (1995) Tree and Tundra Cover
Anomalies in
the Subarctic Forest-Tundra of Northwestern Canada. Arctic.
48(1)13-21.
Wang, T., A. Hamann, D.L. Spittlehouse and S.N. Aitken.
2006.
Development of scale free climate
data
for western Canada for use in
resourse
managment. Intl. J. Climatology 26: 383-397
Template Modified From Six
Shooter Media.
Scott T. Black, UBC 2006.









