|
Data
Data were obtained through the
Great Lakes Information Network, which compiles various spatial data sets relevant to the
Great Lakes basin. The following data layers were used in the
analysis:
|
Data
Layer |
Type |
Years |
Source
|
|
Sea Lamprey
(Lake Michigan
Basin) |
Points |
1955-2004 |
Great
Lakes Fishery Commission; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Marquette Biological
Station |
|
Quagga Mussel (Lake Michigan
Basin) |
Points |
2002 |
NOAA
Great Lakes Environmental Research
Laboratory |
|
Zebra Mussel
(Great
Lakes) |
Points |
1990-2006 |
NOAA
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory; Michigan Sea
Grant; U.S. Geological
Survey |
|
Lake
Michigan Basin |
Polygon |
2006 |
Great
Lakes Commission, Great Lakes
GIS |
|
Lake
Michigan Basin |
Outline
(line) |
2006 |
Great
Lakes Commission, Great Lakes
GIS |
|
Accessible
spawning routes |
lines |
2006 |
Great
Lakes GIS, Institute for Fisheries Research, U.S. Geological
Survey |
|
Michigan
counties |
Polygons |
2000 |
Bureau
of the Census |
|
Wisconsin
counties |
Polygons |
2000 |
Bureau
of the Census |
|
Illinois
counties |
Polygons |
2000 |
Bureau
of the Census |
|
Indiana
counties |
Polygons |
2000 |
Bureau
of the
Census |
Methods
Analyses
were performed using ArcGIS 10. All data layers were projected with
NAD_1983_Great_Lakes_Basin_Albers and clipped to the appropriate
area using the Lake Michigan Basin outline as a mask.
Determining where invasive
species are able to disperse
Appropriate buffer
distances were determined for sea lampreys, quagga mussels, and
zebra mussels based on their previous ability to disperse inland.
Zebra mussel points generally covered to the edge of the basin, and
data points extended beyond the boundary before clipping the layer,
so their buffer was made to extend the entire basin. For sea lamprey
and quagga mussels, their dispersal distance in the area was taken
to be the distance of the furthest point from the boundary
of Lake Michigan, found with Point Distance in Arc
Toolbox. The buffer distances were as follows:
The
potential dispersal distance buffers were intersected with
accessible spawning
routes in the basin, which could serve as
suitable habitat to facilitate their spread. The selected area for
sea
lampreys
, quagga mussels , and zebra
mussels were mapped.
To
determine where the different species' likely dispersal areas
overlapped with each other, the Intersect tool was used to determine
the overlap of areas for
zebra mussel & sea lamprey only
, zebra
mussel & quagga mussel only
, and
all
three
. To determine where only zebra
mussels
were likely to be, the Clip
tool was used to remove areas that were relevant to the other two
species from the zebra mussel area.
Comparing invasive species in the
different states and counties
The original species points were mapped according to county.
All counties were aggregated
into a single polygon using the Overlay tool. A Spatial
Join was used to associate the
species occurrence points with the counties.
State polygons were created by clipping the Lake Michigan Basin polygon to
each state's county polygon and used
for the purpose of showing state outlines. V
alues displayed on the maps are of invasive species occurence by county,
and represent [absolute number of species
points]/[area of the county within the basin].
The generated potential species dispersal areas were also mapped
by county. Four different maps
were created -- one for each for the potential distribution of
"zebra mussels only," "zebra mussels & sea lampreys only,"
"zebra mussels & quagga mussels only," and "all three invasive
species". To accomplish this, a Spatial Join was used to link
counties with the potential distributions generated earlier. Values
mapped represent the the percent of the total potential habitat in
the entire basin to show the relative weight that should be put on
emphasizing monitoring efforts in each
county.
|