ABSTRACT
Many cities in North
America have
been finding ways to combat urban sprawl. The theories of Smart Growth
promote the ideas of creating dense communities which concentrate
growth in already developed urban centres and nodes, while preserving
green space and other land-uses. As of 2006, the EcoDensity Initiative
in the City of Vancouver has been proposing a major plan to densify the
city and according to proponents therefore improve "sustainability,
liveability and affordability." There has been some recent
opposition to densification plans in Vancouver and, that even if
density is needed, many have also
questioned how one decides where it should be
added. There
has been opposition in some neighbourhoods which have been prioritized
for
densification, such as the Norquay area in East
Vancouver, and residents have claimed that
these areas do not represent the logical
choice of location to densify.
This project,
firstly, examines the current density distributions in the City of
Vancouver using GIS, basing the data on available residential land
capacity, and looking at population as well as structural dwelling and
bedroom densities. Secondly, the project selects various 'amenities'
that are determined to be beneficial to an area planning densification.
These factors are chosen based on principles and goals of Smart Growth
and
EcoDensity. The amenities selected were: transit accessibility
to the CBD, local commercial nodes, parks, community centres and
schools, and proximity rasters were then created for each of the
amenities.
Lastly, a Multi-Criteria Evaluation was conducted examining which areas
matched the amenity requirements best based on determined weightings.
The amenity MCE were also combined with current density data and
therefore areas currently lacking density compared to their 'amenity'
provision
were able to be identified.
The results
showed several areas of the city had potential for densification,
especially areas around East False Creek and also in neighbourhoods
such as Shaughnessy, South Cambie, Oakridge and Riley-Park, where the
new Canada Line will provide increased accessibility, other amenities
are readily available, and the current densities are low. In terms of
structural density, it was noted that many areas have 'bedroom
surpluses' which could potentially be converted into suites and
increase density without redevelopment, especially in Shaughnessy.
Finally, it appears, according to the analysis' criteria, that the
Norquay Area in East Vancouver that had been planned for imminent
densification does not prove to be the logical area to prioritize
redevelopment.
