Compiled with assistance from Frank Gossette, California State
University, Long Beach
NOTES
Since subdivision and other parcel maps are often hand
drafted they do not reproduce well. Try to get an example
from your local land record office to show in class, replacing
the overhead provided here.
UNIT 54 - CADASTRAL RECORDS AND LIS
Compiled with assistance from Frank Gossette, California State
University, Long Beach
A. LAND SURVEYS AND LAND RECORDS
Public need for accurate land information
- governments, land developers, and property owners need
and use land information daily
- land information is the basis of property rights in most
countries
- land information must be used to resolve disputes
- must be accessed when property changes hands
- most of the information that a municipal government
stores is tied to specific geographic locations within
its jurisdiction: property lines, easements, utility and
sewer lines, and many categories of spatial data
- the ability to store, retrieve, analyze, report and
display this public land information efficiently and
accurately is of great importance
- requests for information from a land information
database can number thousands per day
- land information is of variable quality
- the legal description of land properties relies on
accurate survey measurements, monuments with
accurately known location, but also problematic
descriptions such as "middle of river" (river may
change course), marks on trees (tree may have died)
etc.
- in resolving disputes, the source of land
information and its accuracy may be as important as
the information itself
- a land information database may need to include
more than just coordinates
- in the UK:
- base mapping at 1:1,250 scale exists for all urban
and many rural areas
- over 250,000 sheets
- regular program of maintenance and update
- currently being converted to digital form
- in the US:
- largest scale base mapping is 1:24,000 or 1:50,000,
too small for property boundaries
- approximately 108 million parcels of taxable real
property
- records on these are maintained by 83,216 state and
local government agencies
- in local governments, 75% of daily transactions
involve land information
- e.g. address verification, parcel
identification, ownership, budget summaries,
delivery of services
- records are held in unrelated formats
- e.g. property record books, paper files,
microfiche, maps, charts, computer databases
- methods of information management are often as old
as the system of land rights itself - which dates to
before the Constitution
- land data held by one agency are frequently
unavailable to another - not because of
jurisdiction, but because of the method of record
keeping
- leads to unnecessary confusion, cost and
duplication
The cadaster
- the cadaster is an official register of the ownership,
extent and assessed value of land for a given area
- cadastral refers to the map or survey showing
administrative boundaries and property lines
- cadastral information is usually the largest-scale (most
detailed) land information available for an area
- as such, cadastral information can provide a large-scale
base to which other layers of data can be added for
specific purposes
- this is the concept of the multipurpose cadaster or
MPC
- the ideas of integration of spatial data inherent in
the MPC are found in many other areas of GIS
application
- the MPC is an ideal - the actual state of cadastral
information varies widely within the US and from
country to country, despite wide acceptance that the
arguments for MPC are very persuasive
- LIS is a generic term for information systems that deal
with land records
B. GEOMETRY OF CADASTRAL MAPS
Plane surveys and geodetic control
- most cadasters are based on plane surveys
- surveyors have measured the boundaries and property
lines as planar distances from known locations or
benchmarks or monuments
- many, but not all, benchmarks are tied to actual
geodetic control points (longitude/latitude or State
Plane Coordinates)
- conflicts occur when boundaries plotted from survey data
overlap or fail to meet
Absolute versus relative accuracy
- absolute accuracy refers to the relationship of a point
on the map to its actual location on the globe
- relative accuracy refers to the relationship of one point
on the map to another point on the same map
- e.g. a property line may be 400 feet from a USGS marker
which has been globally positioned to be at 112 degrees
West Longitude and 34 degrees North Latitude
- either or both of these measurements could be
inaccurate
- the property line might only be 398 feet away and
the benchmark might be shown to be several hundred
feet off, when measured by GPS or adjusted to the
new North American datum
Coordinate geometry (COGO)
C. THE TAX ASSESSOR AND CADASTRAL SURVEYS
- originally, cadastral maps and surveys were used
exclusively to develop parcel maps for taxation purposes
- based on the Original Surveys of the land area
(county, city, sub-division, etc.)
- however, these maps are not necessarily the legal
authority for taxation or ownership
- the actual surveyor's notes and legal
description provide this authority
Assessor's parcel maps
- basic unit of land is the parcel
- parcels are usually contiguous and are owned by a
single entity (family, individual, corporation,
etc.)
- Tax Assessor (usually a county official in the US)
assigns a number (identifier) to each parcel on the map
Parcel numbers and Tax Roll
- working from the Parcel Maps, the Tax Assessor makes a
list of parcels and their taxable value
- the value of land depends on many things, including
the size of the property (area) and the actual or
permitted uses (agriculture, industry, residential,
etc.) of the land
- tax rolls may also include the legal ownership, the size
of the parcel and the improvements made to the property
- important to note that tax rolls and parcel maps contain
significant amounts of data that can be used for many
purposes beyond tax assessment
- however, many problems arise when they are used for
other purposes since they were compiled at an
accuracy and detail that is required for tax only
- e.g. boundaries shown may not be accurate enough for
city planning purposes
D. EXAMPLES OF THE NEED FOR MPC/LIS
- the following examples illustrate the need for geographic
information systems to handle this type of information
- (this section quotes from and relies heavily on
materials prepared for the US Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Land Management's Study of Land
Information, mandated under Public Law 100-409,
1989)
Prince William County, Virginia
- a mid-size Virginia county
- land deeds are filed with the Clerk of the Court office,
and microfilmed
- a copy of the microfilm is given to the Real Estate
Assessment Office
- certain information is abstracted from the deed and
becomes an assessment record on the county's
mainframe computer, accessible to all departments
- a copy of the deed is used to update a parcel database
- new parcels and subdivisions are entered into an
automated mapping system using COGO
- digital and mylar maps are updated weekly
- since the Assessment Office defines parcels in its own
way for tax purposes there is not a one-to-one
correspondence between the parcel database and the
assessment records
- the geographic data in the parcel database cannot be
linked effectively with the non-geographic
assessment records
- the county is developing a LIS which will implement
a single database with no duplication of data
elements
Louisville/Jefferson County, Kentucky
- 26 governmental units and local utilities produce or
modify 111 sets of maps at annual costs of $3.2 million
- of the 111 sets, 59 are used by more than one
organizational unit and 20 by more than five
- parcels and subdivisions are routinely mapped at least
six times by government and utilities, often at different
scales and levels of accuracy
- area agencies maintain some 95 automated geographic
databases and 110 manual databases
- wide divergence in types and capabilities of
computers
- communication of data is complicated
- replacing current practices with an automated system will
save as much as $5.7 million over a 10 year period
- conservative estimates are that staff efficiency
will increase by at least a third
- plan will include users and data collectors:
Metropolitan Sewer District, local government
agencies, utilities
Los Angeles County, CA
- government consists of over 40 departments, plus
committees, commissions and special districts
- 4084 sq mi area
- approximately 50% of all information is geographically
related
- 7 problems common to all departments:
- lack of structured communication regarding sources,
availability of georeferenced information
- lack of timely and convenient access
- information is not always current or accurate
- information is duplicated, independently maintained
- existing system is time consuming, difficult, labor
intensive
- limited ability to relate geographic and non-
geographic records
- difficulties of different scales, standards,
accuracy, coordinate systems etc.
- LA county presents enormous problems, not only related to
size
- complexity of jurisdiction - many of the
incorporated cities within the county provide their
own services, county government services the
residual area
- management of elections is a major potential
application of LIS - there is one election on
average every 2 days in LA county - each election
has its own set of districts with complex
definitions
- a CAD parcel database alone is estimated at 300 Gbytes
- plan to achieve a county-wide LIS by target date of 1997
E. ADDING MULTIPURPOSE LAND INFORMATION LAYERS
- a Land Information System can be seen to be the result of
adding more "layers" of information (geographic features)
and including more attribute data to the cadastral map
- the base map or cadaster now becomes an MPC (or LIS)
- these data are useful for other, related functions of
land management, planning and administration
Geographic layers
overheads - City map overlays (9 pages)
- additional geographic features can be registered to the
parcel basemap
- e.g. street centerlines, public rights-of-way,
"footprints" of public buildings, and other
information for which the graphic representation is
useful by itself
- other examples include:
- Infrastructure and Public Facilities
- infrastructure may include water lines, sewer lines,
fire hydrants, power poles or other "utilities"-type
information
- Hydrography and Topography
- streams, ponds, underground aquifers, and the 50
year floodplain are all geographic features which
could be useful adjuncts to basic land information
Role of CAD systems in early LIS development
- early LIS development stressed the cadastral map as the
main system product
- ability to add layers of graphic information to the
base map was a major incentive
- because of the availability of Computer-Aided Design and
Drafting (CAD) tools, early automation of land
information was often done on such systems
- since basic parcel boundaries, street information
and some infrastructure information is immediately
useable in graphic form, CAD systems provided LIS
basemaps which could be easily updated and quickly
produced
- the capabilities of these systems do not generally
extend beyond simple production of maps - do not
support sophisticated queries or analysis
Non-geographic land attributes
- geographic features may be associated with an infinite
number of characteristics
- parcel not only has ownership, area, and value, but
can be distinguished on the basic of the allowable
uses to which it can be put, the school district to
which it belongs, or the age of the head-of-
household
- typical LIS attribute data include:
- Land Use and Land Cover
- Zoning and Administration
- Demographics
- as the attribute or tabular data become an increasingly
important component of the system, the ability of simple,
"flat-file" databases which are a part of CAD systems
represent a serious impediment to system growth
- more powerful data managers and GIS software may be
needed
F. GIS AND THE MULTIPURPOSE CADASTER
- many early LIS were created using CAD systems and
relatively simplistic data managers
- as the volume of information increases and more
sophisticated applications are attempted, the
functionality of full-featured Geographic
Information Systems may be required
- powerful, relational DBMS and topologically-
structured, vector GIS software can handle the types
of land-information management tasks which are
typical of contemporary LIS
- example areas in which GIS capabilities are essential:
Integration of graphic and non-graphic information
- general queries
- retrieval of administrative records using
geographical keys (pointing at map, using
topological relations such as adjacency, outlining
query polygon etc.)
- Urban and Regional Planning: thematic mapping
- ability to merge geographic boundaries with
statistical information - rapid creation of thematic
maps in support of planning activities
- Community Development: zoning changes
- rapid update of zoning records, rapid display in map
form using parcel boundaries
Spatial operations for LIS applications
- Urban and Regional Planning: notifications
- use of buffering operation to identify property
owners within fixed distance of proposed project
- Planning: feasibility studies
- use of overlay, modeling to support spatial search
for feasible areas meeting requirements for project
- Public Works: roadwork surface modeling
- use of 3D capabilities to make engineering
calculations
- Utilities: hydrologic modeling
- use of network modeling capabilities to predict
urban runoff, effects of changes in storm water
system
- Schools: population models and districting
- forecasting school populations by small areas based
on demographic, migration, housing development
models
- redistricting to achieve balanced school populations
- Fire: optimal routing
- use of network models for routing emergency
vehicles, site selection for stations
REFERENCES
ACSM-ASPRS Joint Cadaster Task Force, 1985. "Implementing a
National Multipurpose Cadaster," ACSM Bulletin 97:17-21.
ACSM Geographic Information Management Systems Committee,
1988. "Multi-Purpose Geographic Database Guidelines for
Local Governments," ACSM Bulletin 114:19-30.
Chrisman, N.R., and B.J. Niemann, 1985. "Alternative Routes
to a Multi-Purpose Cadaster," Proceedings Auto-Carto 7,
ASPRS/ACSM, Falls Church, VA, pp. 84-94.
Donahue, J.G., 1988. "Land Base Accuracy: Is It Worth the
Cost?," ACSM Bulletin 117:25-27.
Niemann, B.J. and J.G. Sullivan, 1987. "Results of the Dane
County land records project: implications for
conservation planning," Proceedings AutoCarto 8,
ASPRS/ACSM, Falls Church, VA, pp. 445-455.
Reports on the Need for Multi-purpose Cadaster
National Research Council, 1980. Need for a Multipurpose
Cadaster. Washington, DC.
National Research Council, 1982. Federal Surveying and
Mapping: An Organizational Review, Washington, DC.
National Research Council, 1982. Modernization of the Public
Land Survey System, Washington, DC.
National Research Council, 1983. Procedures and Standards for
a Multipurpose Cadaster, Washington, DC.
Wisconsin Land Records Committee, 1987. Final Report:
Modernizing Wisconsin's Land Records, Institute of
Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
WI.
EXAM AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Determine the status of LIS development in your own
county/municipality. Is there an LIS, or are there plans to
automate the land records system?
2. The 1980 NRC report cited above recommended, amongst
other things, that "Federal legislation should be proposed
to authorize and fund a program to support the development
of a multipurpose cadaster in all parts of the Nation".
What factors might account for the fact that this
recommendation has not yet been implemented?
3. Discuss the significance of scale in a multipurpose
cadaster. What is the minimum scale required to carry out
each of the applications of an MPC described in this unit?
What scale would you recommend for a cadastral base for your
community?
4. How do the contents of an LIS database differ from those
of a) a CAD and b) a GIS database? What additional
information must be stored if the LIS database is to
function effectively?
Back to Geography 370 Home Page
Back to Geography 470 Home Page
Back
to GIS & Cartography Course Information Home Page
Please send comments regarding content to: Brian
Klinkenberg
Please send comments regarding web-site problems to: The
Techmaster
Last Updated: August 30, 1997.