Yikes!
Sixty million observations! Eighty eight million!
The paragraph above is a lie. When words hurt, sentences kill. And those do. My first sentence above erased eight hundred forty one thousand, three hundred seventeen individual stories. The second sentence disappeared five hundred sixty-one thousand, one hundred thirteen.
How could I be so callous, so care-less?
What can these huge numbers mean, when the complexity of individuals, all those multifaceted lives, are distilled down into ... each ... one? One. Each one an observation. Capable of being observed.
Now I think I understand why Markus Doel (2001) was so angry with the number one. It puts everything on the same level, and that feels violent, when we realize how many different sides there are to our own personal, individual identities. Think of trying to summarize as as "one" "observation." One? Louis Wirth (1938) taught us that the segmented self is the essence of personal identity in the overwhelming informational ecosystem of the city: we show different sides of ourselves when we interact with different people, in different circumstances. Indeed, we act so differently that perhaps it would be more honest just to say that we really are different 'selves' in different situations. Michael Curry (1997) brilliantly updates the idea for today's "digital invidual" -- the passwords, avatars, and cookie-and-GPS-trails each of us leaves for others exploring the strange landscapes of the social web.
. Torsten Hagerstrand and Allan Pred understand this, and so does Julie Graham (1993), Ananya Roy (2011), Michael Curry (1997), and Elizabeth Lee (2012).
So does Auguste Comte, and Louis Wirth, and Peter Gould, and Julie Graham, they're speaking now through Michael Curry (1997), and Ananya Roy (2011), Elizabeth Lee (2012), and so many others, each