Changes in the Canadian Urban System
For a convenient worksheet with all the data, see this.
- Mapping Growth and Decline in the Canadian Urban System, 2001-2006. Database compiled by Markus Moos and Anna Glasmacher, School of Planning, University of Waterloo. Data Source: Statistics Canada (2008). Cumulative Profiles for Census Tracts and Census Subdivisions, 2006 Census of Population and Housing. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
- For scholarly sources, track down the footnotes cited in the background paper, the references in Bunting & Filion or Knox & McCarthy, or consider these:
Looking for the North American City
Gallup International (2012). Voice of the People End of the Year Survey, 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Study No. 33504.
The study description from ICPSR is here.
I've extracted the data for the U.S. and Canada, and have prepared some simple cross-tabulations here. Note that these cross-tabulations are weighted -- each survey respondent is assigned a weight to account for variations in different groups' likelihood of being part of the survey. This is why the numbers of respondents are in decimal form.
- References you might find useful:
SCHOLARLY SOURCES
Yasmeen Abu-Laban and Judith A. Garber (2005). "The Construction of the Geography of Immigration as a Policy Problem: The United States and Canada Compared." Urban Affairs Review 40(4), 520-561.
Thomas Ott (2004). "Are Canadian Cities Becoming More American? Evidence from the West." Journal of the Association for Canadian Studies in German-Speaking Countries 24(1), 162-175.
Eran Razin and Mark Rosentraub (2000). "Are Fragmentation and Sprawl Interlinked? North American Evidence." Urban Affairs Review 35(6), 821-836.
Laura Reese (2004). Do Goals Drive Stragegies? Differences in Canadian and U.S. Approaches to Local Economic Development. Paper presented at City Futures Conference, University of Illinois at Chicago. Detroit: Wayne State University.
Bruno Théret (1999). "Regionalism and Federalism: a Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of Economic Tensions between Regions by Canadian and American Federal Intergovernmental Transfer Programmes." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (3), 479-512.
JOURNALISTS' REPORTS
Allen Abel (2010). "Apocalypse Soon." The National Post, Comment, May 29, B11.
Associated Press (2010). "Obama Speech Defends Government." New York Times, May 1.
Randy Boswell (2010). "Common Culture Question Splits Poll Respondents." Vancouver Sun, June 2, B2.
Brian Lee Crowley, Jason Clemens, and Niels Veldhuis (2010). "It's Finally Our Time." The National Post, May 26, A13.
Bruce McCall (2004). "Application for Permanent Canadian Residence." The New Yorker, November 22, 108.
Ottawa Citizen (2010). "The Census Numbers Racket." Ottawa Citizen, June 4, p. A16.
Philip Resnick (2010). "Quebecers Signal a Return to the Two Solitudes." Vancouver Sun, May 13, A17.
Mattathias Schwartz (2010). "Firing Line." New York Times, July 29.
Kate Zernike and Carle Hulse (2010). "In Washington, a Call for Religious Rebirth." New York Times, August 28, A15.
VIDEOS
The Globe & Mail (2010). "It's Our Time to Lead." Toronto: The Globe & Mail, September 22.
Morton Weinfeld (2008). "Social Identity in Canada: What are the Facts and Issues?" [excerpt]. Calgary: Sheldon Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership.
Metropolitan Economic Restructuring
The materials below present you with a wide range of choices for the raw data you'll need for your project. There's a lot of options, but don't be overwhelmed by the long list. All you need to do is to find data for one or two metropolitan areas you want to study, copy the data for a start and end time period to a new empty worksheet, and then do the same for the national totals. Then you'll be ready to calculate a shift-share analysis like one of the examples shown in the background paper.
You're free to analyze industrial or occupational change -- or both -- for any city or metropolitan region anywhere, so long as you can obtain reliable data. I've given you a head start by assembling data for metropolitan areas in Canada and the United States, but you're free to study any metropolitan area so long as you can get the right information. You will need 1) total values of the thing you're studying, say, jobs, organized according to a set of categories (i.e., industries or occupations), for 2) two separate time periods, for 3) for a city that you're interested, and a "reference region." This reference region is usually the entire nation or country, but it could also be a province, state, or similar political zone.
Once you've done the calculations, then look through Chapter 4 of Knox and McCarthy, and/or Chapters 6, 7, and 16 of Bunting and Filion, Fourth Edition. Some of these chapters will be more relevant than others, of course, depending on which kind of metropolitan region you choose to study. I also highly recommend that you read this:
For other valuable scholarly sources, consider a few of these:
John S. Adams (1990). "The Regional Service Economy: A Contemporary Mirage?" Journal of Applied Manufacturing Systems, Spring, 3-10.
For national and local press coverage of deindustrialization, service sector growth, and other metropolitan restructuring topics, do keyword searches in one of these news archives:
Canadian Data
Employment by Industry, monthly
Employment by Occupation, monthly
If you're interested in analyzing trends prior to 2000, or exploring other measures, you'll need to navigate the CANSIM (Canadian Socio-economic Information Management) system, provided by the Computing in the Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS) initiative at the University of Toronto. Follow these directions:
2. Choose "CANSIM II via CHASS, University of Toronto"
3. Choose "CANSIM Multidimensional View"
4. Continue in either English or French (although my deepest apologies for my ignorance and inability to provide all the instructions bilingually).
5. Choose "CANSIM Multidimensional @ CHASS Main Menu"
6. Choose "Browse Tables by Subjects"
7. Chose "Labour"
8. For Industry data, choose "Employment and Unemployment"
the data for Census Metropolitan Areas are in Table 2820056; choose "by dimensions" and then proceed to choose the places, years, and industry categories.
the data for all of Canada are in Table 2820088; choose "by dimensions" and then proceed to choose the years and industry categories to download.
9. For Occupation data, after step 7 above, choose instead "Occupations"
the data for Census Metropolitan Areas are in Table 2820058; choose "by dimensions" and then specify the details of what you need to download.
the data for all of Canada are in Table 282009; choose "by dimensions" and then specify the details of your request. Specify "both sexes" to get data for both males and females, and also ask for both full- and part-time employment. After you download your worksheet, you will need to add full- and part-time employment together to make the data comparable to the total employment estimates provided for the metropolitan-area level file.
United States Data
Industry Data for United States Metropolitan Areas (MAs)
Note: (N) means that the category was not defined for that particular year. Prior to 1979, for instance, the Department of Commerce did not separate out state goverment employment from local government employment. Therefore, if you wish to compare totals for pre-1979 with later years, you will need to use the combined state and local employment totals to ensure comparability in the shift-share analysis.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Annual). Regional Economic Information System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Not long ago, the Census Bureau introduced a new type of geographical classification: the "micropolitan area." Think of it this way: small-town mayors and chambers of commerce wanted to be called "metropolitan areas" too, so they could have more detailed information on economic trends that would help in economic development planning.
The 2001-2009 files incorporate several revisions and improvements to previously released estimates.
Note: (D) means that the data value is suppressed to ensure confidentiality. Use caution if you wish to study a metropolitan area or micropolitan area where one or more sectors have suppressed data. You will need to combine all sectors with (D) codes, and subtract the subtotal of all non-suppressed values from the total employment figure for the metropolitan area in order to obtain a figure for a category that you will probably want to call "all other industries" in your table. You will then need to do the same combinations for the national figures to avoid creating bias in the shift-share analysis. This kind of adjustment is not too difficult, so long as the pattern of (D) codes is the same for the time periods you wish to compare.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Annual). Regional Economic Information System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Occupation Data for United States Metropolitan Areas
New, revised Metropolitan Area (MA) definitions
- Nationwide, 2005; Consolidated (big) Metropolitan Areas, 2005; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3)
- Nationwide, 2006; Consolidated (big) Metropolitan Areas, 2006; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3)
- Nationwide, 2007; Consolidated (big) Metropolitan Areas, 2007; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3)
- Nationwide, 2008; Consolidated (big) Metropolitan Areas, 2008; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3)
- Nationwide, 2009; Consolidated (big) Metroplitan Areas, 2009; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3)
- Nationwide, 2010; Consolidated (big) Metroplitan Areas, 2010; All other MAs (Part 1, 2, 3).
Older Metropolitan Area (MA) definitions
Note that beginning in late 2004, U.S. federal agencies began to report their data according to new definitions of metropolitan areas. These new definitions provide much more detail for smaller cities, but the downside is that it can be very hard to compare data for the old and new metropolitan definitions. Therefore, you should be careful when trying to compare the occupation datasets above with those below. You will need to read the documentation on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website to determine whether there have been major changes for a particular metropolitan area you're interested in.
Other Useful Shift-Share Tools
Mapping Global Firms and World Cities
Housing Markets and Neighborhood Change: Hedonic Vancouver
Mapping Vancouver's Evolving Social Mosaic
- The Sample, and simple, Classical Social Area Analysis, as described in the project background paper
Maps of Factor Scores for:
- For a selection of scholarly sources using various forms of factorial ecology, see the references here.
- For a reference map of Municipalities in Metro Vancouver, see this.
- For a variety of reference maps for the city of Vancouver, see this.
The Factorial Ecology of Vancouver, 2006
You should choose one of the "Results" files below to organize your analysis and interpretation:
Maps for Factor 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- The raw data downloaded from the Canadian Census Analyzer for the Vancouver CMA in 2006:
A more manageable subset of variables
in a single worksheet for 2006 is here.
- Census Tract Reference Maps for the Vancouver CMA in 2006
The Factorial Ecology of Vancouver, 2001.
(To interpret some of the variables, you should also
consult the data worksheet with all variables, below)
Maps of Factor Scores for:
Student-Defined Ecologies of Vancouver: customized output from factor analyses conceptualized and specified by...
- Raw Data Worksheet for All Variables from the 2001 Census, Vancouver CMA
- Census Tract Reference Maps for the Vancouver CMA in 2001
Useful Thematic Maps of Vancouver and the Metropolitan Area
- Selected Maps from the City of Vancouver Housing Centre:
Other Useful References
- Si-ming Li, Quan Hou, Susu Chen, and Chunshan Zhou (2010). "Work, Home, and Market: The Social Transformation of Housing Space in Guangzhou, China. Urban Geography 31(4), 434-452.
- Wayne K.D. Davies and Robert A. Murdie (1993). "Mapping the Social Ecology of Cities." In Larry S. Bourne and David F. Ley, eds., The Changing Social Geography of Canadian Cities. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 52-75.
- Vancouver Foundation (2012). Vital Signs for Metro Vancouver. Vancouver: Vancouver Foundation.
- Wayne K.D. Davies and Robert A. Murdie (1991). "Consistency and Differential Impact in Urban Social Dimensionality: Intra-Urban Variations in the 24 Metropolitan Areas of Canada." Urban Geography 12(1), 55-79.
- Elvin K.Wyly (1999). "Continuity and Change in the Restless Urban Landscape." Economic Geography 75(4), 309-338.