URBAN GEOGRAPHY PLENARY LECTURE (2010)
Washington, DC AAG
Chair: Robert W. Lake (Rutgers University)
Organized by: Robert W. Lake (Rutgers University), James DeFilippis (Rutgers University)
Jennifer Robinson
The Politics of Urban Neoliberalism's Travels
Discussant: Patricia Ehrkamp
Discussant: Carolyn Cartier
Co-sponsored by Urban Geography and the Urban Geography Specialty Group
Abstract: Urban neoliberalism has attracted substantial theoretical and political attention. Nuanced and careful assessments of the reformulations of neoliberalism coexist with incisive political commentary and committed opposition to the often debilitating effects of neoliberal innovations in urban governance. This presentation will seek to: assess the localisation of existing theories of urban neoliberalism; consider the difference that starting with individual city experiences might make to the process of theorisation; and try to reconcile a determined critical politics with a careful analysis of neoliberalism as a diverse array of technologies of urban governance.
URBAN GEOGRAPHY PLENARY LECTURE (2009)
Las Vegas AAG
Co-Chair: Robert W. Lake (Rutgers University)
Co-Chair: James DeFilippis (Rutgers University)
Look for the published version in Issue 3, 2010, of Urban Geography
AbdouMaliq Simone (Goldsmiths College, University of London)
Sustaining Cityness: Reflections on Dynamic and Problematic Diversities of Popular Quarters in Africa and Southeast Asia
Discussant: Pablo Bose (University of Vermont)
Discussant: Cindi Katz (CUNY)
Co-sponsored by Urban Geography and the Urban Geography Specialty Group
Abstract: Primary attention to cities in the Global South tends to focus on how fast they are changing in terms of spectacular new projects, the remaking of city centers, the pushing out of large numbers of urban residents of all social classes, and the extent to which cities are becoming more alike through these major development projects. Alternately, the focus is placed on the poor, on massive slums, insalubrious environmental and social conditions, and the potential threats posed by impoverished and unsettled urban populations. What lags behind is attention to the continued small and medium level developments of residential and commercial districts that have occupied specific territories within cities for a long time.
While it is true that many of these districts have been effaced and remade, or remain vulnerable to such, many continue to make significant investments in upgrading local infrastructure, diversifying local economies, and renewing important social institutions that promote cohesion and a sense of belonging. These efforts are sometimes undertaken as a kind of hedge to defer their vulnerability to displacement, but more often reflect a solid confidence in the ability of these districts to remain viable parts of the urban system. Importantly, while residents living on a block or particular sub-section of an administrative district and historical neighborhood may have a lot in common based on similar levels of household income or ethnic identity, these blocks and sections are usually situated in a larger territory of often remarkable heterogeneity.
In a fundamental way, then, these districts intersect people of many different backgrounds, incomes, residential histories, aspirations, and orientations to the city. This heterogeneity, while sometimes prompting debilitating disputes and polarization, often works as a key resource to the very survival of the district. While it is true that larger numbers of residents are being pushed to the outskirts of cities or actively seeking new residential locations outside of overcrowded, noisy, and increasingly dilapidated central city areas, the capacities of residents to hang on, to undertake their own versions of remaking need to be re-explored and valorized.